Making the Case for Trust in Reporting Across Kansas, Texas and Tennessee
CFINR Executive Director delivers keynote to three state press associations
The Center for Integrity in News Reporting took its message of objective journalism to three state press associations in June, with Executive Director Rufus Friday telling publishers, editors and journalists in Kansas, Texas and Tennessee that public trust in the news media sits at a 50-year low and that winning it back requires “will, not a budget.”
Friday delivered the same keynote, “Trust in Reporting: It’s Not an Option,” at the Kansas Press Association’s convention in Hutchinson on June 5, the Texas Press Association’s 146th annual convention on June 19 and the Tennessee Press Association’s summer conference in Franklin on June 25. In Texas and Tennessee, he closed the appearances by surprising Sally Sexton of the Weatherford Democrat in Texas and Drew Wheeler of the McNairy County News in Tennessee with the first CFINR awards presented in their states, two of the half-dozen $5,000 state awards the Center has presented this summer.
The numbers he carried to every stop
The case rests on data Friday returned to in all three states. Gallup polling that measured trust in the media at 72% in 1976 put it at 28% in September 2025, and 34% of Americans now say they have no trust in the media at all, the first time in the poll’s history that complete distrust outweighs any trust. The news media has passed Congress as the country’s least-trusted institution. And when the Reuters Institute asked 92,000 people across 46 countries whether they trust their national news media, the United States ranked last, at 29%.
“I share these numbers not to depress you,” Friday said in Hutchinson. “I share them because the scale of the problem determines the size of the response we need. And the response we need is not incremental.”
Friday traced the erosion to four causes: readers’ pull toward information that confirms what they already believe, and newsrooms that blurred the line between news and opinion; the economics of 24/7 cable and social media, which reward speed, outrage and commentary over verification; the replacement of trained journalists by influencers as local beats disappear; and a debate inside journalism itself over whether objectivity is worth defending.
He took on the last cause directly at each stop, citing “Beyond Objectivity,” the 2023 Arizona State report in which a majority of 75 editors surveyed argued for moving away from objectivity in news reporting. Friday called some of the frustrations behind the report legitimate, naming false balance and thin coverage of communities of color, working-class communities and rural communities. Then he drew the line, quoting former Washington Post editor Marty Baron: “We want objective judges, objective doctors, objective scientists. It’s natural to expect objective journalists too.”
“The profession doesn’t need to abandon the standard,” Friday said in Kansas. “It needs to live up to it.”
Three states, three hometown giants
At each stop, Friday grounded the argument in the state’s own journalism history. In Kansas, it was William Allen White, the Emporia Gazette editor arrested in 1922 over a sign supporting striking railroad workers, whose Pulitzer Prize-winning reply, “To an Anxious Friend,” warned that “only in time of stress is freedom of utterance in danger.” Both sides of that strike, Friday noted, stayed peaceful in Emporia because both felt the Gazette had covered them fairly.
In Texas, it was Walter Cronkite, the Houston paperboy who became the most trusted man in the country, Friday said, “not because he told people what to think,” but “because they believed he was telling them what happened.” In Tennessee, it was Adolph Ochs, the Knoxville paperboy who went on to buy The New York Times and promised readers the news “impartially, without fear or favor, regardless of any party,” and John Seigenthaler of The Tennessean, who founded the First Amendment Center after 43 years at the paper.
The prescription: draw the line publicly
Friday’s prescription was the same in all three states: adopt a statement of core journalistic values, publish it where readers see it every day and make the separation between news and opinion impossible to miss. He pointed to the Bangor Daily News, which tells readers, “Our only agenda is the truth,” and to the mural Stars and Stripes staff painted at Camp Humphreys in South Korea, five words reading “Credibility. Impartiality. Truth-telling. Balance. Accountability.” When the Pentagon later proposed generating a large share of the paper’s content itself, said Friday, who chairs the Stars and Stripes National Publisher Advisory Board, the staff “had already drawn the line. In writing. Publicly.”
“Your readers cannot see your internal standards,” he told the Texas audience. “They can only see what you publish.”
A first look at CFINR’s own data
In Hutchinson, Friday previewed the Center’s first original research, a YouGov survey of 2,000 American adults released the following week. Measuring 11 major national news organizations, the survey found only two, ABC News at 53% and NBC News at 51%, trusted by a majority of Americans. On average, just 13% of Americans said those outlets always make a clear distinction between news and opinion; 16% said they never do. Asked what kind of reporting they prefer, 53% chose reporting that tells them what was said and lets them decide what is true, while 47% wanted reporting that says whether a statement is true or false. Republicans preferred the neutral style, 65%; Democrats the interpretive style, 56%.
“The same editorial choice that builds trust with one half of the country erodes it with the other,” Friday said in Texas. “And the data points one way. Neutral, factual, let-the-reader-decide reporting is the approach most likely to rebuild trust across the whole spectrum.”

CFINR Executive Director Rufus Friday presents the $5,000 Texas award to Weatherford Democrat Managing Editor Sally Sexton. (Monica Faram | Times-Review)







